Videos
To view a video of a past event, click on the title below.
To be notified when we add a new video, please click here to subscribe to the CRWS/ISSI YouTube channel.
Spring 2019
Friday, February 1 I 12:00-1:30pm
The Devil Really is in the Details: Understanding the Global Radical Right
Brian Porter-Szucs, Arthur F. Thurnau Professor of History, University of Michigan
There are obvious similarities between Vladimir Putin, Viktor Orbán, Recep Erdoğan, Jair Bolsonaro, Jarosław Kaczyński, Rodrigo Duterte, Donald Trump, and all the other politicians we have come to call ‘populists.’ Not only is that label misleading, but analyzing them as part of a single ideological movement can lead to confusion. This presentation will use the example of Poland to illustrate the necessity of local expertise in understanding seemingly global trends.
Wildavsky Conference Room, 2538 Channing Way
Co-sponsored by the Institute of Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies and the Berkeley Center for Right-Wing Studies
Thursday, April 11 I 4-5:30pm
Center for Ethnographic Research Colloquia Series:
Martina Avanza, Senior Lecturer, Political Sociology, University of Lausanne, Switzerland
Ethnography does not seem to be suited for situations in which the ethnographer dislikes the group she or he studies. Some fieldworkers even think that ethnography without empathy is almost impossible to achieve. That is why scholars tend to do ethnography of left-wing or subaltern group mobilizations and to study the right from a distance, with an etic perspective.
Building on my experience as an ethnographer working on right-wing groups in Italy (the Lega Nord party and the “pro-life” movement), I will talk about the challenges of this kind of fieldwork and also about possible contributions not only to the field of right-wing studies, but also to the ethnographic literature. In particular, I will address issues of ethics and reflexivity that are particularly acute in this kind of fieldwork.
Co-sponsored by: Center for Right Wing Studies
Wildavsky Conference Room, 2538 Channing Way
Thursday, April 18 I 4 -5:30pm
Center for Right Wing Studies Colloquia series:
Cynthia Miller-Idriss, Professor of Education and Sociology; Director, International Training and Education Program, American University
Miller-Idriss explores how extremist ideologies have entered mainstream German culture through commercialized products and clothing laced with extremist, anti-Semitic, racist, and nationalist coded symbols and references. Drawing on a unique digital archive of thousands of historical and contemporary images, as well as scores of interviews with young people and their teachers in two German vocational schools with histories of extremist youth presence, Miller-Idriss shows how this commercialization is part of a radical transformation happening today in German far right youth subculture. She describes how these youths have gravitated away from the singular, hard-edged skinhead style in favor of sophisticated and fashionable commercial brands that deploy coded extremist symbols. Virtually indistinguishable in style from other clothing popular with youth, the new brands desensitize far right consumers to extremist ideas and dehumanize victims.
Co-sponsored by: Center for German and European Studies
Wildavsky Conference Room, 2538 Channing Way
Thursday, April 25 | 4:00-6:00 pm
Inaugural Conference on Right-Wing Studies Keynote Panel
Sponsored by: Berkeley Center for Right-Wing Studies
A keynote panel of experts weigh in on the current state of the far right in the U.S., Europe, and Latin America, opening the conference.
The Berkeley Center for Right-Wing Studies is pleased to present the Inaugural Conference on Right-Wing Studies. This interdisciplinary conference will feature dozens of new and established scholars from around the world whose work deals with the Right as a social, political, and/or intellectual phenomenon from the 19th century to the present day. Participants will have the rare opportunity to join an expanding network of scholars who focus on right-wing studies, facilitating the development of this interdisciplinary field and future collaborations that emerge from these connections.
Co-sponsored by: Institute for the Study of Societal Issues, Department of History, Department of Sociology, Department of Gender and Women's Studies, Institute of European Studies, Center for Latin American Studies, Scholars Strategy Network, Southern Poverty Law Center, Haas Institute for a Fair and Inclusive Society, Townsend Center for the Humanities.
More information is available on the conference website.
Sibley Auditorium, Bechtel Engineering Center, UC Berkeley
Spring 2018
Thursday, March 15 I 4:00-5:30pm
George Hawley, Assistant Professor of Political Science, The University of Alabama
In 2015 and 2016, the so-called Alt-Right – the latest iteration of the American white nationalist movement – experienced exponential growth. In 2017, it made headlines across the globe. Some feared it represented a serious threat to racial progress and even American democracy. However, the Alt-Right has also faced extraordinary setbacks, and it is not clear that it will even continue existing as a meaningful political or cultural force. In this talk, Professor Hawley will reflect on the past, present and future of the Alt-Right in American politics.
Wildavsky Conference Room, ISSI, 2538 Channing Way
Sponsor: Berkeley Center for Right-Wing Studies, UC Berkeley
Fall 2017
Thursday, November 9 | 4:00-5:30pm
CRWS Colloquia Series:
Katherine Cramer, Professor, Department of Political Science, and Director, Morgridge Center for Public Service, University of Madison-Wisconsin
with Arlie Hochschild, Professor Emerita of Sociology, UC Berkeley, as respondent
The current populist moment in U.S. democracy is an opportunity to think deeply about the flaws in our democracy, even though it is more commonly used as an opportunity to consider flaws among populist voters. Extending from the idea that populism is a political discourse that pits people versus the government, Cramer examines conceptions of the role of “the people” in democracy by looking in close at the way people view the civic competence of their political opponents. She draws on a decade of observations of conversations of people who eventually supported Trump in the 2016 presidential election in communities across Wisconsin, as well as analysis of correspondence from people reacting to their views. Her findings speak to the nature of contemporary American democratic identity, and suggest a significant barrier to improving the health of democracy is an inconsistent view of the agency of the people.
Warren Room (295 Boalt Hall), Berkeley Law
Co-sponsored by Thelton E. Henderson Center for Social Justice, UC Berkeley, The Charles and Louise Travers Department of Political Science, UC Berkeley, Department of Sociology, UC Berkeley
Thursday, October 19 | 4:00-5:30pm
Berkeley Center for Right-Wing Studies presents:
Duncan McDonnell, Senior Lecturer, School of Government and International Relations, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
Why are right-wing populists in the European Parliament divided between three different groups? Using party position data and interviews with key figures from 11 parties, this presentation discusses how right-wing populists now adopt two main international alliance strategies: “respectable radicals” like the Danish People’s Party and the Sweden Democrats preference the domestic legitimacy gained through European-level partnerships with more moderate parties over ideological coherence. By contrast, parties like the French National Front and the Italian Northern League proudly ally with similarly radical parties as part of a long-term move towards what we refer to as the “Euro-Nationalist International.”
Wildavsky Conference Room, ISSI, 2538 Channing Way
Co-sponsored by Institute of Europen Studies , UC Berkeley, Institute of International Studies, UC Berkeley
Spring 2017
Friday, April 21 I 9:00am-3:30pm
Berkeley Center for Right-Wing Studies Symposium:
Anxious Democracy: The First Hundred Days of The Trump Presidency
This conference focuses on the first hundred days of the presidency of Donald Trump from perspectives including legal, historical, sociological, and policy analysis. Our aim is to begin academic conversations and develop analyses of how the Trump administration and the movement and ideology it represents relate to social, economic and political transformations in the United States and around the world. Scholars from UC Berkeley and other Bay Area academic institutions will speak on implications and effects of the administration's foreign and domestic policies, as well as the legal questions surrounding its agenda.
This symposium is free and open to the public.
Blanche DuBois Room (D37), Hearst Field Annex, UC Berkeley
Co-sponsored by the History Department, the Institute of Governmental Studies, the Townsend Center for the Humanities, the Graduate School of Journalism, and the Haas Institute for a Fair & Inclusive Society, UC Berkeley
Tuesday, March 14 I 4:30-6:00pm
Center for Right-Wing Studies Colloquia Series:
The Present Political Divide: What To Do Now
George Lakoff, Director of the Center for the Neural Mind & Society and Professor of Cognitive Science and Linguistics, UC Berkeley
How does Trump think, how does he control public discourse, and why does he have the appeal that he has? What do the Democrats fail to understand about Trump and his followers? And what can those in the American majority that oppose Trump do now, and what should the majority and the media not do that would only help Trump?
Banatao Auditorium, Sutardja Dai Hall
Co-sponsored by the Department of Sociology, Linguistics Department and Berkeley Center for Neural Mind & Society, UC Berkeley
Wednesday, March 1 I 4:00-5:30pm
Center for Right-Wing Studies Colloquia Series:
Oh, God! The Religious Right to Sexual Pleasure on Christian Sexuality Websites
Kelsy Burke, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Sociology, University of Nebraska - Lincoln
This talk examines how some conservative evangelical Christians justify a wide range of sexual practices and pleasures within the confines of religious orthodoxy and heterosexuality. Based on her 2016 book, Christians under Covers: Evangelicals and Sexual Pleasure on the Internet, Burke shows how online dialogue on Christian message boards and blogs both reinforces and reimagines religious rules about gender, marriage, and what counts as sexually normal and good.
Wildavsky Conference Room, ISSI, 2538 Channing Way
Co-sponsored by the Department of Sociology and the Department of Gender and Women’s Studies, UC Berkeley
Thursday, February 2 | 4:00-5:30 pm
Center for Right-Wing Studies Colloquia Series:
The Master Plan: ISIS, al-Qaeda, and the Jihadi Strategy for Final Victory
Brian Fishman, Counterterrorism Research Fellow in the International Studies Program at New America
This talk will offer an incisive narrative history of the Islamic State, from the 2005 master plan to reestablish the Caliphate to its quest for Final Victory in 2020. Drawing on large troves of recently declassified documents captured from the Islamic State and its predecessors, counterterrorism expert Brian Fishman tells the story of this organization's complex and largely hidden past--and what the master plan suggests about its future. Fishman argues that only by understanding the Islamic State's full history--and the strategy that drove it--can we understand the contradictions that may ultimately tear it apart.
Wildavsky Conference Room, ISSI, 2538 Channing Way
Co-sponsored by Institute of European Studies
Fall 2016
Tuesday, November 29, 2016
Reflections on the 2016 Election and The Republican Party under President Trump (broadcast on C-SPAN)
Carole Joffe, Professor, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, UCSF; Professor Emerita, Department of Sociology, UC Davis
Paul Pierson, Professor of Political Science, UC Berkeley
Lawrence Rosenthal, Chair, Berkeley Center for Right-Wing Studies
Moderated by Kim Voss, Professor of Sociology, UC Berkeley
This panel will reflect on the 2016 U.S. presidential election and its implications for the Right in the United States. Dr. Rosenthal will address the emergence and significance of the Donald Trump phenomenon, focusing on Trump's exploitation of rifts among factions of the Republican Party that assumed unprecedented levels in 2016. Professor Joffe will discuss the role that traditional electoral priorities of the Right, particularly abortion and marriage equality, played in the outcome of the election. Professor Pierson will discuss what the outcome of the election means for the future of the Republican Party and the American Right.
Social Science Matrix Conference Room, 8th floor, 820 Barrows Hall
Co-sponsored by the Scholars Strategy Network, Department of Sociology, and the Charles and Louise Travers Department of Political Science
Thursday, October 27, 2016
Black Elephants in the Room: The Unexpected Politics of African American Republicans
Corey Fields, Assistant Professor, Sociology, Stanford University
What is it like to be black in the highly racialized context of the Republican Party? Black Elephants in the Room considers the role of race in the political experiences of African American Republicans and discusses the dynamic relationship between race and political behavior in the purported “post-racial” context of U.S. politics. Drawing on vivid first-person accounts, this talk will shed light on the different ways black identity structures African Americans’ membership in the Republican Party. Moving past rhetoric and politics, we begin to see everyday people working to reconcile their commitment to black identity with their belief in Republican principles. And in the end, we see that the identity politics of African American Republicans is shaped by the meanings they attach to race and the political contexts in which those meanings are developed and expressed.
Wildavsky Conference Room, ISSI, 2538 Channing Way
Co-sponsored by the Department of Sociology and the Charles and Louise Travers Department of Political Science, UC Berkeley
Thursday, October 20, 2016
Political Passion and the Gun Debate: How a Small Minority Came to Dominate Gus Safety in the US
Firmin DeBrabander, Associate Professor of Philosophy, Maryland Institute College of Art
Twenty-first century America is undergoing a radical experiment in gun rights. The number of privately-owned guns, and expansive gun laws, has ballooned in recent years. Most Americans favor stronger gun control restrictions, but the NRA’s radical agenda remains largely uncontested. Why is this? Why isn’t our gun violence epidemic, unparalleled in the developed world, sufficiently alarming to American voters, to stand up against the loud and angry gun rights minority? This presentation will examine the reasons behind the success of a small, but passionate minority able to dominate debate over gun safety in the US.
Wildavsky Conference Room, ISSI, 2538 Channing Way
Co-sponsored by the Department of Sociology
Spring 2016
Wednesday, April 13, 2016
Yiannis Gabriel, Chair in Organizational Studies, University of Bath, School of Management
The presentation will examine conspiracy theories and nostalgia as parts of the unfolding European drama, focusing on developments in Greece. Conspiracy theories represent a quest for scapegoats, sometimes in the form of ‘parasites’, people or groups who take and give nothing back. Nostalgia, for its part, exacerbates a desire for the return of a mythical past, free of parasites and undesirables. Both conspiracy theories and nostalgia play a central part in the ideology of the New Dawn against Greece’s financial, social and existential crisis. The talk will develop the argument that the rise of conspiracy theories and xenophobic nostalgia can be viewed as warning signs of miasma, a highly contagious state of material, psychological and spiritual pollution that descends plague-like, and afflicts entire communities, organizations or nations. Miasma dissolves love bonds and leaves a community dominated by fear, guilt, hate, despair and lies.
Wildavsky Conference Room, ISSI, 2538 Channing Way
Co-sponsored by the Institute of European Studies
Wednesday, April 6, 2016
"The Koch Effect: The Impact of a Cadre-Led Network on American Politics"
Theda Skocpol, Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology, Harvard University
In Washington, DC and the states, Republicans push unpopular policies - and sometimes also oppose legislation favored by prominent business groups. Why is that? New research highlights resource shifts on the U.S. right and the growing influence of the Koch network, a coordinated set of big donors, lobbying groups, and constituency organizations that now rivals America's political parties. At this talk, Professor Skocpol will present early results from a collaborative study of "The Shifting U.S. Political Terrain" under way at Harvard University and grassroots mobilizations orchestrated by the Koch Network.
Room 60, Evans Hall
Co-sponsored by the Scholars Strategy Network and Department of Sociology
Thursday, February 18, 2016
Alina Polyakova, Deputy Director, Eurasia Center, Atlantic Council
Far-right nationalist parties are on the rise in Western and Eastern Europe. Buttressed by the financial crisis of 2008, the ongoing migration crisis, and the threat of terrorist attacks, previously fringe political parties resonate with growing numbers of Europeans who are disenchanted with the European project. Many European far-right parties are also supporters of Russian President Vladimir Putin. While far-right parties are not new to Europe, Russia's financial and ideological support for such parties, is. The reemergence of nationalism, as evidenced by the rise of the European far right, and the Kremlin's use of far-right groups as a tool of political influence presents short- and long-term foreign policy challenges. My book, The Dark Side of European Integration, based on dissertation research at UC Berkeley, argued that the success of far-right parties across Europe is, in part, a cultural backlash against rapid European economic and political integration. In this lecture, I will focus on how recent geo-political events have helped euroskeptic far-right parties such as the National Front and Jobbik while solidifying the relationship between such parties and Putin's Russia. While the rise of the European far right has not been a top priority for US foreign policy, these political parties, and their ties to Russia, present a growing challenge to the transatlantic partnership.
Wildavsky Conference Room, ISSI, 2538 Channing Way
Co-sponsored by the Institute of European Studies and the Institute of Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies, UC Berkeley
Wednesday, January 27, 2016
"2015: A Transformative Year in Far Right Politics?"
Cas Mudde, Associate Professor, School of Public and International Affairs, University of Georgia
Although 2015 did not have a central focal point, like the European elections in 2014, the alleged rise of far right and populist politics was again among the main political debates in most western democracies. Every major event in European politics was linked to a possible surge in the support of far right parties and politicians, from the terrorist attacks in France at the beginning and end of the year to the Eurozone crisis and refugee crisis in between. Politicians like Marine Le Pen, Viktor Orban, and Donald Trump dominated the news with crass nativist, authoritarian, and populist statements. Commentators argued that the far right had moved to the mainstream, while some critics alleged that the mainstream had moved to the far right. Whatever the exact direction of the movement, it is clear that distinctions between traditional far right politicians and mainstream politicians are more and more difficult to make, which calls for a reflection on both terminology and classification. In this lecture I will focus on the main developments in far right politics of the past year and assess whether 2015 was merely a freak year or constitutes a transformative year for the far right. I will discuss the fate of the usual suspects, i.e. the far right parties in Europe (e.g FN), as well as some new unusual suspects, i.e. far right politicians in the political mainstream parties (e.g. Orban and Trump), and argue that the mainstreaming of far right politics has made the distinction between far right and mainstream parties less clear and less relevant.
Wildavsky Conference Room, ISSI, UC Berkeley, 2538 Channing Way
Co-sponsored by Center for Research on Social Change and Institute of European Studies
Fall 2015
Tuesday, September 29, 2015
“The Art of Recruitment: How the 'Islamic State' Trains its Community Organizers”
Brian Fishman, Counterterrorism Research Fellow, New America Foundation and Research Fellow, Combating Terrorism Center at West Point
In early 2009 a new document appeared on jihadi web forums. It was designed to empower a small group of very radical, and very dedicated, people to take over the world. This document, titled “A Course in the Art of Recruitment,” aimed to resolve a deep tension in the global jihadi movement: the Internet was the connective tissue holding together radicalized jihadis from across the globe, but recruiters still found that an on-the-ground, personal touch was necessary to mobilize would-be recruits. The 51-page document, attributed to pseudonymous Abu 'Amr al-Qa'idi, aimed to resolve that conundrum not by directly recruiting individuals to al-Qa'ida's cause, but rather by empowering already radicalized, but inadequately trained, individuals to more effectively select, recruit, and organize on their own.
Abu `Amr’s handbook prescribes a highly structured recruitment process with multiple stages and clear, simple metrics to assess a recruit’s suitability and progress—essentially, the bureaucratization of decentralized jihadist recruitment. Abu `Amr argues that structuring recruitment and providing simple quantitative assessment tools will allow recruiters with less education and knowledge of Shari`a to recruit safely and effectively.
Abu 'Amr's methods have gained new currency as social media has enabled jihadis recruiters, often in Syria or Iraq, to apply an individualized touch to the recruitment process from thousands of miles away. But the concepts these digital recruiters utilize are not new, they are not ill-defined, and, for many, they are not always intuitive. Abu 'Amr's acolytes, for example, will explicitly avoid recruiting devout Muslims out of fear that they will understand the particulars of Islamic doctrine better than the recruiters themselves. Regardless, Abu 'Amr's manual provides insight into the movement that has become the 'Islamic State' and offers a glimpse into how a wide-range of radical movements, not just jihadis, are likely to organize in the future.
Co-sponsored by UC Berkeley’s Center for Middle Eastern Studies and Institute of European Studies
Spring 2015
Thursday, February 19, 2015
"Ideas with Consequences: The Federalist Society and the Conservative Counterrevolution"
Amanda Hollis-Brusky, Assistant Professor of Politics, Pomona College
Fred Smith, Assistant Professor of Law, UC Berkeley School of Law, as respondent
There are few intellectual movements in modern American political history more successful than the Federalist Society. Created in 1982 to counterbalance what its founders considered a liberal legal establishment, the organization gradually evolved into the conservative legal establishment, and membership is all but required for any conservative lawyer who hopes to enter politics or the judiciary. It claims 40,000 members, including four Supreme Court Justices, dozens of federal judges, and every Republican attorney general since its inception. But its power goes even deeper.
In Ideas with Consequences, Amanda Hollis-Brusky provides the first comprehensive account of how the Federalist Society exerts its influence. Drawing from a huge trove of documents, transcripts, and interviews, she explains how the Federalist Society managed to revolutionize the jurisprudence for a wide variety of important legal issues. Many of these issues-including the extent of federal government power, the scope of the right to bear arms, and the parameters of corporate political speech-had long been considered settled. But the Federalist Society was able to upend the existing conventional wisdom, promoting constitutional theories that had previously been dismissed as ludicrously radical. As Hollis-Brusky shows, the Federalist Society provided several of the crucial ingredients needed to accomplish this constitutional revolution. It serves as a credentialing institution for conservative lawyers and judges and legitimizes novel interpretations of the constitution that employ a conservative framework. It also provides a judicial audience of like-minded peers, which prevents the well-documented phenomenon of conservative judges turning moderate after years on the bench. As a consequence, it is able to exercise enormous influence on important cases at every level.
Fall 2014
Wednesday, October 1, 2014
"Hungary's Conservative Revolution: Sui Generis or Future Pattern?"
Jason Wittenberg, Associate Professor, Charles and Louise Travers Department of Political Science, UC Berkeley
Since the landslide victory of Fidesz in the 2010 Hungarian national parliamentary election, Hungary has undergone nothing short of a conservative revolution. With its parliamentary supermajority, Fidesz can rule without regard for opposition views, and has used that power with vigor. Since taking power Fidesz has drafted and passed a new conservative constitution, weakened the separation of powers, restricted freedom of speech, squeezed its socialist and liberal rivals out of positions of influence, and gerrymandered the electoral system in its favor. My comments will examine the roots of these changes and whether they are harbingers of future developments in post-communist Eastern Europe.
Fall 2013
Thursday, October 17, 2013
Corey Fields, Assistant Professor of Sociology, Stanford University
Laura Stoker, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of California at Berkeley, as respondent
This research explores how race animates the politics of African-American Republicans. I depart from existing approaches that treat race as an axis of identity. Instead, I argue for the necessity of treating race as a set of ideas about black people. Interviews and ethnographic observations reveal that strong expressions of racial identity are common among African-American Republicans. However, there are very different ideas about who constitutes the group being identified with. Divergent ideas about black people divide African-American Republicans. These ideas impact 3 aspects of their political behavior: (1) interpretation of conservative social policy, (2) their ability to organize themselves, and (3) their capacity to build alliances with white Republicans. To fully understand black political behavior, analysts must move from only considering race as a marker of identity for black people, to also thinking about race as a set of ideas black people have about black people.
Fall 2011
Saturday, October 15, 2011
"Populism and the Tea Party in American Politics"
Bill Whalen, Resident Research Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University
Lawrence Rosenthal, Executive Director and Lead Researcher, Berkeley Center for Right-Wing Studies
Henry E. Brady, Dean Goldman School of Public Policy
Moderated by:
Christine Trost, Program Director, Berkeley Center for Right-Wing Studies; Assistant Director, Institute for the Study of Societal Issues
Spring 2011
Wednesday, April 20, 2011
"Goddess of the Market: Ayn Rand and the American Right"
Jennifer Burns, Assistant Professor of History, Corcoran Department of History, University of Virginia
Professor Burns will speak about her recently published book, Goddess of the Market: Ayn Rand and the American Right (Oxford University Press, 2009), an intellectual biography of the controversial novelist and philosopher Ayn Rand. Worshipped by her fans, denounced by her enemies, and forever shadowed by controversy and scandal, Rand was a powerful thinker whose views on government and markets shaped the conservative movement from its earliest days. Drawing on unprecedented access to Rand's private papers and the original, unedited versions of Rand's journals, Professor Burns offers a groundbreaking reassessment of this key cultural figure, examining her life, her ideas, and her impact on conservative political thought.
Fall 2010
Friday, October 22, 2010
Fractures, Alliances and Mobilizations in the Age of Obama: Emerging Analyses of the "Tea Party Movement"
This conference will bring together leading scholars, along with several journalists and political commentators, to discuss and debate the emergence and implications of the "Tea Party Movement" in the wake of Obama's election. Much has been made of the Tea Party Movement in the media however there is little, if any, scholarship on it. This conference, which features historians, political scientists, sociologists, and race and gender scholars, is intended to begin to fill this gap. Key questions that the conference will address include: Is the "Tea Party Movement" (TPM) a new social movement, an emerging political party, a media-driven construction, or something else? What are the origins, ideology, and constituencies of the TPM and how were they formed? What is the relationship between the TPM and the Right, especially the GOP, in the U.S., and what role will the TPM play in shaping the 2010 and future elections? How do race, class and gender factor into the TPM's message and membership? How are TPM activists tapping into and/or managing the populist, libertarian, and radical currents on the Right, as well as fear, anger and resentment among segments of the American public? What significance does the TPM hold for the future of American politics?
9:00 - 9:15 am Welcome and Introduction of Key Note Speaker
Lawrence Rosenthal, Executive Director, Center for the Comparative Study of Right-Wing Movements, Institute for the Study of Societal Issues, University of California, Berkeley
9:15 - 10:30 am Keynote Address "The Tea Parties Now"
Rick Perlstein, Journalist and Author of Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America and Before the Storm: Barry Goldwater and the Unmaking of American Consensus
10:45am - 12:30 pm Panel 1: New Forms of Activism on the Right: The Tea Party--Emergence of a Movement?
Presenters:
Christopher Parker, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Washington
Ruth Rosen, Professor Emerita of History, University of California, Davis; Visiting Professor of History, UC Berkeley
Clarence Lo, Associate Professor of Sociology, University of Missouri-Columbia
David Weigel, Political Reporter, Slate, and MSNBC contributor
Debra Saunders, Columnist, San Francisco Chronicle
Chair:
Jack Citrin, Director, Institute of Governmental Studies & Heller Professor of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley
1:30 - 3:00 pm Panel 2: The Tea Party and the Right: Fractures and Alliances within the Republican Party and other groups on the Right
Presenters:
Martin Cohen, Assistant Professor of Political Science, James Madison University
Alan I. Abramowitz, Alben W. Barkley Professor of Political Science, Emory University
Peter Montgomery, Senior Fellow, People for the American Way
Bill Whalen, Research Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University
Chair:
Eric Schickler, American Politics Professor of Political Science, UC Berkeley
3:15 - 4:45 pm Panel 3: Tapping into Fear, Anger and Resentment: The Tea Party and the Climate of Threat
Presenters:
Lisa Disch, Professor of Political Science and Professor of Women's Studies, University of Michigan
Charles Postel, Associate Professor of History, San Francisco State University
Chip Berlet, Senior Analyst, Political Research Associates
Devin Burghart, Vice President, Institute for Research & Education on Human Rights
Chair:
Paola Bacchetta, Associate Professor of Gender & Women's Studies, University of California, Berkeley
4:45 - 5:00 pm Closing Remarks
Christine Trost, Program Director, Center for the Comparative Study of Right-Wing Movements, and Assistant Director, Institute for the Study of Societal Issues, UC Berkeley
Spring 2010
Thursday, March 11, 2010
"Does Gender Matter in Organized Racism?"
Kathleen Blee, Distinguished Professor of Sociology and History, and Chair of the Department of Sociology, University of Pittsburgh
How do we know if gender matters in right-wing movements? Drawing on my studies of women in the 1920s Ku Klux Klan and modern U.S. organized racism, as well as new scholarship on women in right-wing movements across the globe, this talk looks at assumptions that enable and circumscribe how we understand gender on the political right. These include templates of German Nazism, the male right, social movement progressivism, historical & spatial continuity, and mobilization from the private to the public.
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Michelle Goldberg, journalist and author of The Means of Reproduction: Sex, Power and the Future of the World (Penguin, 2009)
Carole Joffe, Professor Emerita of Sociology, University of California Davis and author of Dispatches from the Abortion Wars: The Costs of Fanaticism to Doctors, Patients and the Rest of Us (Beacon Press, 2010)
The assassination of Dr. George Tiller last May marked an upsurge in violence and intimidation by the anti-abortion movement in the U.S. At this event, two experts on domestic and international battles over women's reproduction will discuss recent developments in the U.S. and anti-abortion movement and situate it within the larger, global movement aimed at limiting women's reproductive rights.
Fall 2009
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Leonard Zeskind, President, Institute for Reseach & Education on Human Rights
Nick Lowles, Editor, Searchlight Magazine
Race and nationalism are back on the political agenda. Zeskind and Lowles will examine these issues in the U.S. and Europe, focusing on both the most recent developments and the social movements that brought us to this point.
Institute for the Study of Societal Issues
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720-5670
TEL: 510.642.0813
FAX: 510.642.8674
